Friday, January 16, 2009

Federal Mortgage Banks Show Cracks

The mortgage crisis is seeping into one of the last dry corners of the mortgage business, the regional network of Federal Home Loan Banks, which provide U.S. banks with hundreds of billions of dollars in low-cost funding to support lending to home buyers.
The little-known network has grown in importance as banks lose access to other sources of funding because of the credit crunch. The volume of outstanding loans provided by the home-loan banks has increased by 58 percent since the beginning of 2007, to more than $1 trillion at the end of September. But several of these banks hold mortgage-related investments that have plummeted in value. The losses are draining the capital foundations of the home-loan banks, forcing them either to reduce their lending -- making mortgages more expensive and harder to get -- or to raise additional capital. The money could come from taxpayers. The Treasury Department created a program in September that for the first time allows the home-loan banks to borrow directly from the federal government. That hasn't happened yet, but some financial experts said it's looking increasingly likely.
A report from Moody's Investors Service this week, citing "the demonstrated importance of the [home-loan banks] to the banking system through the credit crisis," concluded that the government was likely to provide the necessary support to keep loans flowing. The 12 home-loan banks are collectives chartered by the federal government and owned by member financial firms. The government's sponsorship allows the collectives to borrow money at low cost, which they lend to banks of all sizes, from giants such as Bank of America to small community lenders. Nearly all U.S. banks are members of at least one of the collectives. As with other banks, federal regulators require the home-loan banks to keep a certain amount of money as a capital foundation to support their lending. The home-loan bank in Seattle, which serves the northwestern United States, said this week that the declining value of its investments probably dropped its capital below a level required at the end of the year, though a final determination won't be made until the bank completes its fourth-quarter bookkeeping. The home-loan bank in Pittsburgh warned yesterday that it, too, was in danger of dropping below a capital threshold. And Moody's estimated that six more home-loan banks could follow Seattle and Pittsburgh. The most immediate impact is that the collectives are paying less to their members. Several of the collectives have suspended dividend payments. The 12 collectives had paid about $1 billion in dividends to member banks during the first nine months of the year. The payments are an important source of revenue, particularly for smaller banks. Many banks also hold relatively large amounts of stock in the collectives. In normal times, the banks can sell that stock back to the collectives, redeeming their investments. But several of the collectives have announced moratoriums on redemptions, freezing access to the money.
And if the situation continues to deteriorate, the collectives could require their members to make additional investments. The collectives got into trouble by investing $76.2 billion in private mortgage securities, packages of mortgages not guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The market value of those securities had dropped to $62.7 billion at the end of September and has almost certainly continued to fall. The Pittsburgh collective, for example, spent $8.8 billion on securities that declined in value to about $6.4 billion by the end of December. The banks have not sold the securities, so they have not incurred a loss, but accounting rules require them to acknowledge some of the loss in value and set aside capital in a proportionate amount. As a result, the Pittsburgh bank is running short on capital. At the end of September, it had $2.6 billion more than the minimum required by federal regulators. The bank estimates that it exceeded the minimum by only $72 million at the end of December.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Private mortgage insurance deductible from the tax

The private mortgage insurance makes it possible the borrower to acquire a mortgage in which the installment is less than twenty percent. The borrowers pay the mortgage deprived out of their pocket. Now, the private mortgage insurance is deductible from the tax for residents of the USA.

In fact, the mortgage insurance is government or private. If the mortgage insurance is government or private, the mortage insurance is deductible from the tax.

To acquire the mortgage insurance is an alternative for the mortgage of Piggyback traffic. The mortgage of Piggyback traffic is punt simply a mortgage. The borrower acquires another mortgage on the mortgage for the installment.

The deductible one from the tax applies for the modest purchasers of income. That means that the borrower gains up to $100.000. If the borrower would gain above the $100.000, the borrower can only deaden the private mortage insurance partially.

Moreover, the deductible one from the tax applies only to the new mortgage. The financing of mortgage must have to occur in calendar year 2007. Unless the borrower made a refinancing of mortgage for the mortgage or after the calendar year 2007, one will not allow the deductible one from the tax.

They is good news to the million Americans. The million Americans pays the mortgage insurance. The mortgage insurance countermands only outside when the stockholders' equity at the paid house or the entire amount goes more than twenty percent of the principal quantity.

In a paramount way, the mortgage insurance will be made available with this turning from the events.

Like the tax reduction of interest of mortgage, the tax reduction of mortage insurance profits from the million American. Now, the borrowers or the owners at the house have a choice between the interests of mortgage of the mortgage or the premiums of mortgage insurance like tax reduction.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Mexican Banorte pulls plug on 20, 30-year mortgages

Banorte, Mexico's fifth largest bank, has stopped offering 20- and 30-year mortgages because of increased market uncertainty caused by the world credit crisis. Mexican banks have escaped much of the fallout from the international financial turmoil but increased risk aversion and a recent rise in defaults has led many to scale back lending growth. "As a bank that receives short-term deposits and lends long term, we need hedging instruments," Banorte (GFNORTEO.MX) chief executive Alejandro Valenzuela said in an interview transcript sent to Reuters on Monday by the bank. "Today, there is no market for those (instruments) with reasonable prices. When it normalizes, we'll begin offering again," Valenzuela said. Yields on the Mexico's 30-year bond , which the government began placing two years ago to give banks and investors a reference for long-term lending costs, surged in the second half of last year as investors shocked by the world financial crisis hauled money out of emerging markets. Since then the 30-year yield has tumbled to 7.70 percent. Mexico's banks are considered well-capitalized. They have not sought to lend to subprime borrowers and have avoided many of the problems plaguing financial groups in the United States and Europe. Still, nonperforming consumer loans have risen sharply in recent months and are expected to climb more as the economy grinds to a halt this year and many Mexicans lose their jobs. Mexico's banking system is dominated by international giants including Citigroup (C.N), BBVA (BBVA.MC), Santander (SAN.MC) and HSBC along with locally-controlled Banorte.

Record Number of Hoosiers Modify Their Mortgages In 2008

Last year saw a record number of Hoosiers trying to save their homes from foreclosure by modifying their mortgages.

The Homeowners Preservation Foundation reports there were 5,000 mortgage modifications in Indiana during the third quarter of 2008. That's four times more than in the same period of 2007.

Mortgage modifications have become a key tool to reducing home foreclosures. Homeowners can make mortgage deals that possibly lower or delay their monthly payments. They make financial sense for mortgage owners because they keep the money flowing from homeowners.

But not all homeowners have been able to save their home through the process. Nearly half of the mortgage modifications result in higher mortgage payments, and some end up back in default.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Credit crunch takes a toll on mortgage brokers

The credit crisis has already taken a big toll on the nation’s largest banks, brokerage firms and finance companies, but it’s also hit small mortgage brokers, including one of Western New York’s most influential.

The former president of the New York Association of Mortgage Brokers last month voluntarily gave up his state license to run Twinstar Mortgage.

The Western New York lender had been in operation since October 1998, and had full-service offices in Buffalo, Fredonia and Lakewood. It has also done business elsewhere in the state.

But despite his reputation, founder and president Gregory A. Krauza said the firm couldn’t sustain its business, as the credit crisis has wrought unprecedented changes on the mortgage industry. Consumers aren’t borrowing, lenders have gone out of business, and there are fewer customers eligible for the fewer loan options.

“It was a very difficult decision to make. A lot of blood, sweat and tears went into building my business into what it was,” he said. “But we were forced to make a choice. I’m not doing enough volume to warrant having my own business.”

Krauza also said the firm struggled to keep up with the ever-changing rules, new regulatory demands, and rising costs of doing business in New York state.

“It has become increasingly difficult for small brokers to secure financing and pay the fees and assessments that it takes to run a small business,” Krauza wrote in an e-mail. “Hopefully, all the good guys will not be forced out.”

Twinstar is just one of a number of small mortgage brokers who have closed their doors or merged with larger competitors in the past two years because they’re unable to survive.

Others locally include Snyder Funding, Greenwich Mortgage, Anderson Funding, and Carmichael Funding, as well as branches of mortgage brokerage and banking companies. Wholesale representatives of large national lenders, who buy loans from brokers, have also been let go, as their firms retrenched or left the business while licking sizable wounds.

And other competitors say they expect the downsizing to continue. “I am so sorry to hear that Greg is surrendering his license,” said Nancy Gascoyne, a broker at MultiSource Funding in Cheektowaga, who is also a past president of the New York Association of Mortgage Brokers. “But I doubt if he is the only one or will be the only one in the coming months.”

The biggest factor is the decline in business volume, first because of the direct results of the subprime mortgage debacle, and now also because of the recession. Billions of dollars in losses and a subsequent credit crunch caused many subprime and “alternative-A” lenders to go out of business, pull back the reins, or withdraw completely, leaving the industry with fewer lenders and less capital.

At the same time, the survivors have taken many products off the market, while tightening underwriting standards sharply for those that remain. Customers who used to be able to qualify no longer can. And some lenders are requiring brokers to do at least a minimum amount of business with them, or not offer their products at all.

The result has been a sharp reduction in loan options and eligibility, especially for borrowers with imperfect credit. And despite the lowest mortgage rates ever, borrowers themselves are being cautious, not wanting to take on more debt while they’re fearing for the security of their jobs. So loan demand is down as well.

If that’s not enough, brokers say, they’re being hammered on the other side by higher regulatory fees and requirements. The state Banking Department is a self-funded agency whose $81 million annual budget relies on examination, application, and other fees, which have risen sharply after the state switched a few years ago from a flat $500 annual fee to an assessment based on size. Last year, Krauza paid $4,000.

And those fees are expected to go up again with the adoption this year of a nationwide mortgage licensing system to register individual loan officers.

“This is not uncommon,” said Michael Bonito, president of MultiSource, and another former president of the state trade group. “The state of New York and the federal government have made it increasingly difficult for small business owners in the mortgage industry to survive in this environment.”

On top of that, the exodus of both large and small players from the industry means the same or higher costs are being borne by fewer entities. Bonito said his company’s fee has already risen from $2,500 in the first year to $4,500 last year, and he expects it to rise again to $7,000 this year, but with half the business volume from 2005.

There’s also new audit rules, consumer protection regulations, and the expensive requirement for brokers to post a bond that the state can call upon to pay fines or fees.

“The increased regulations, fees and general decline in business will have many negative effects on the mortgage business,” Gascoyne said. “The unfortunate reality is that the consumer will be the ultimate victim.”

In the meantime, Krauza has taken a position as general manager of Route 60 Homes, a designer and builder of modular and manufactured houses. He still has his registration as a mortgage loan officer.

Homeowners refinance at lower mortgage rates

When state employee Tim McManus of Sacramento peers into the future, he sees 4.5 percent interest.

"I'm hoping it will go down more. One more drop," says the Pocket homeowner with a first mortgage at 6 percent and a second at 7.75 percent.

Sacramento's Debbie Fernandez has already locked in at 4.875 percent. That will knock $300 a month off payments for a house she bought in Houston in October. The rate then was 6.25 percent.

But Fernandez, a nurse, is still shopping.

"I hope we can do better."

Roseville tech worker Robert Gage is also waiting for the right moment to refinance.

"I can get 4.5 percent for two points," he said. "I'm hoping for 4.75 percent with no points. That's what my goal is."

As 2009 opens, the "refi" chase is on in neighborhoods across the country and across the region.

This new suburban sport was launched by mortgage rates that in recent weeks have fallen to lows not seen in almost four decades, offering potential to shave millions of dollars in debt from Sacramento-area households. Thirty-year fixed rates are suddenly floating in a zone of 5 percent and below – before fees – bringing a rush of curiosity and applications, area mortgage brokers, bankers and credit unions say.

It's still not clear if lenders will be as willing to play the game as borrowers. Tightened credit rules, diminishing home values and other economic factors will have a big effect on how many actual refinancings take place.

But the flood of interest is already stressing an industry that has been greatly downsized over the last two years. Nationally, it could be overwhelmed by a deluge of refinancings, said Jim Paterson, partner and broker at Gold River-based Mortgage Consultants Group.

"There will be a period when rates drop, a true drop in rates, when it will take longer to get a loan," he said. "It will add two weeks to the process."

Government moves markets

The catalyst is Federal Reserve action to buy $600 billion in mortgage debt from government mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, analysts say. The government intervention aims to make mortgage funds cheaper and more plentiful to help revive the nation's battered economy.

"All of our channels, the Internet, call centers and branches are experiencing significant increases in application volume," said California-based Bank of America spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens.

The push is prompting the bank to shift 300 staffers from its home equity operations to mortgage lending, she said.

Chico-based Tri Counties Bank is also seeing "a big pickup in refinancing," said Chief Executive Officer Rick Smith. "As these rates have hit sub 5 (percent), everyone seems to want to come in."

Yet for all the reported frenzy, it's still too early to tell if there is – or will be – a 2003-like refinance "boom," said Terry Halleck, president and chief executive of Sacramento-based The Golden 1 Credit Union.

"The past couple of weeks, applications have gone up about 300 percent from a year ago. It's huge. The real question is whether people will complete the loan or are just rate-shopping," she said.

The lack yet of a real boom is partly because many homeowners still believe rates may go lower as the economy weakens. And unlike 2003, many borrowers won't qualify for today's tightened credit rules.

"I had to jump through every hurdle on my loan," said Fernandez, who is moving back to Houston. "They're really scrutinizing people."

Other owners also lack adequate home equity to refinance. And today's lower rates only apply to loans under $474,950 in most of the region.

But so many homeowners are browsing, Halleck said, that Golden 1 is starting an application fee "to filter out the people who aren't serious."

That's not the only problem for lenders in a volatile rate environment. Paterson said lenders are also seeing a rash of people "breaking" or walking away from their rate locks as a better rate comes along.

That can cost a lender $800 in "hedging" costs on a $200,000 loan, he said. Halleck said Golden 1 doesn't generally allow people to break their locks because of the cost.

Mortgage Modification: Do They Deliver?

Homeowners in foreclosure are often desperate to modify their mortgages but most have been unsuccessful. A local firm promises help -- for a price.

My Safe House in Oceanside promises to modify mortgages but they don't have a license to do that, according to the Better Business Bureau.

"We are seeing a tremendous amount of scam and fraud in this area," said Sheryl Bilbrey of the BBB. "This company has an F rating. It's a licensing rating. We know companies in this category are required to have a license. These guys don't."

The address of My Safe House in Oceanside is also home to a number of other web sites, run by Gary Bobel. One site, First Federal, promises a 98% success rate in mortgage modifications and a money-back guarantee -- something experts say is impossible.

Bobel says he doesn't need a license to operate, and stood by his company's claims, "I would not take the money if I could not help them."

When San Diego 6 News was there, all we saw was a phone-room and a tote-board listing the numbers of people who had paid $2995 to the unlicensed firm.

Karlee Mariel worked for Bobel back in December.

"I was hired to be on the phone all day long," described Mariel. "I don't want people who are losing their homes to be taken advantage of or experience any more hardship."

Friday, January 9, 2009

Until Now Nowadays Nearly 10 percent of Latinos lag on mortgaNearly 10 percent of Latinos lag on mortgagesges

Until now nearly one in 10 or 10 percens Latino homeowners fall behind in mortgage payments last year, and about 3 percent said they had received a foreclosure notice, a Hispanic research group reported Thursday.

The Pew Hispanic Center's survey of Hispanic adults found that 9 percent said they missed a mortgage payment or made a partial payment during the past year. Nearly half of respondents, 47 percent, indicated they were homeowners, a figure consistent with census data that shows 49.5 percent of Hispanics owned their homes in the third quarter of 2008.

Among Hispanic renters, 5 percent said they had lived in a home that went into foreclosure in the past year.

"Latinos are being impacted by the housing market downturn," said Mark Hugo Lopez, the center's associate director. "A significant share, 25 percent, for example, are worried their home might actually go into foreclosure next year."

The center's survey of 1,540 Hispanic adults, conducted in English and Spanish last November, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Hispanics make up 15 percent of the U.S. population.

The strain felt by Hispanic homeowners seemed consistent with that of all U.S. homeowners. The Mortgage Bankers Association reported last month that a record one in 10 American homeowners with a mortgage was at least one month behind on payments or in foreclosure at the end of September 2008.

Lautaro Diaz, a housing expert for the National Council of La Raza, said it's likely the numbers of Hispanics having trouble paying mortgages will increase given the fact that financial institutions marketed subprime mortgages or "exotic" loan products heavily to minorities, and often advertised in Spanish language media.

The Pew study also found strong worry among Hispanics about their finances.

About 75 percent of Latinos said their personal finances were in fair or poor shape, Pew researchers said, but 67 percent said they expect their financial condition to improve.

A previous Pew study showed the unemployment rate for Latinos was 7.9 percent in the third quarter of 2008, compared with 6.1 percent for the total U.S. work force.

Citigroup supports measure giving courts big say on mortgage reductions

he suggested change in the nation's bankruptcy laws has been repeatedly proposed -- and defeated -- in recent years.

Under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, judges currently have the right to reduce the principal of auto, credit-card and other loans but cannot reduce the principal on a primary mortgage under any circumstances. As a result, homeowners who go into bankruptcy often wind up with mortgage payments that are even higher than the ones they had before, after skipped payments and other fees are added to the principal.

Some housing experts and many Democrats blame this unwillingness to reduce the principal on mortgages for the difficulty that many homeowners have had as they try to modify their mortgages and avoid foreclosure.

But giving bankruptcy judges the power to "cram down" mortgages has been opposed by congressional Republicans and mortgage lenders such as Citigroup, who have warned that it would make providing loans riskier and, because of that, reduce the amount of credit available to buyers.

The measure was termed a deal-breaker in last fall's $700-billion Wall Street bailout bill and was left out of the final package. But Democratic leaders said Citigroup's about-face could be the crack that breaks the banking community's dam of opposition to the idea.

"This is the breakthrough we've been waiting for," said the bill's chief sponsor in the Senate, Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.). "They can make a big difference in convincing their fellow institutions to join us."

Last month, the powerful National Assn. of Home Builders also switched positions, removing its objections to a similar bill in the House sponsored by Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.). That move was another signal that the bloc of industry groups lined up against the legislation is fissuring as the foreclosure crisis has worsened.

Durbin said the measure was necessary to stem the rapid rise in foreclosures, which have quadrupled since the fall of 2007, potentially affecting more than 8 million homeowners nationwide.

So far, lenders modifying mortgages have focused on other means of reducing monthly payments, including extending the term of the loan and reducing the interest rate.

But there are indications that those borrowers were running into trouble again, either because their payments remained too high or because their homes had lost so much value that it was unrealistic to continue making payments on the full value of the principal.

Moreover, economic conditions have significantly worsened in recent months. And some banks, including Citigroup, have received new infusions of capital as part of the government's economic rescue programs and may be in a better position to resume lending.

In a statement, Citigroup said it would support Durbin's legislation provided that it applied only to mortgages in effect before passage of the act. To be eligible, borrowers would have to contact their lenders and try to work things out before filing for bankruptcy.

The company also said it would support the proposal only if a provision was eased that would void the mortgage if the lender was found to have violated consumer protection laws.

The exception would be if the lender violated specific sections of the Truth in Lending Act that already carried such rescissions of mortgages as penalties.

In letters to members of the House and Senate, Citigroup Chief Executive Vikram Pandit endorsed the proposal, saying, "This legislation would represent an important step forward. Given today's exceptional economic environment, we support its swift passage."

In his statement, Pandit did not specify why the company had changed its position.

But Durbin said that earlier efforts to slow the rate of foreclosures were obviously not succeeding.

"I think they may have come to this with some reluctance, but became resigned to the fact" that foreclosures were escalating, Durbin said.

It is unclear whether other banks will join Citigroup. But Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said his office has heard from other banking executives who wished to discuss the legislation.

"My office has now been called by heads of most of the major banks in the country, saying they want to hop on board," Schumer said Thursday after the deal was announced. "And I'm now hopeful that we can get the banking industry to be supportive of this provision -- at the very least, not oppose it."

Industry groups remain concerned that the bill would apply to all mortgages, not simply the subprime loans that helped spark the current recession. That, they argue, would provide some homeowners with an incentive to seek bankruptcy or buy a larger house than they may be able to afford.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Average Mortgage Rate Hits 5%, Lowest in Decades

Average Mortgage Rate Hits 5%, Lowest in Decades. It is because the impact of the global economy crisis.
The Federal Reserve’s plan to coax mortgage rates lower is working: rates on 30-year fixed loans fell for the 10th consecutive week to the lowest levels in decades, according to a recent Freddie Mac survey. What is not clear, however, is whether rates are attractive enough to lure a significant number of home buyers back into the ailing housing market.Interest rates on conforming mortgages dropped to an average of 5.01 percent for the week ending Jan. 8, with an average fee of 0.6, which is known as a point and is paid to lower the mortgage amount. That was down from last week’s 5.10 percent and 5.87 percent a year ago, according to Freddie Mac, and a high of about 6.7 percent last summer.Mortgage rates are at their lowest point since Freddie started its survey in 1971.The decline in rates was initially spurred by the Federal Reserve’s plan, announced in late November, to buy back $500 billion in mortgage-backed securities backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. Since demand for those securities had dried up, the Fed hoped that buying a sizable number of these investments would raise their price and lower their yields. Mortgage rates tend to track those yields. The Fed started buying mortgage-backed securities on Monday, and had bought a total of $10.21 billion in securities as of Wednesday.“Since the Fed announced they would buy mortgage-backed securities, we have seen a pretty healthy increase in refinance applications, while purchase applications have trended up, but not as significantly,” said Orawin Velz, the Mortgage Bankers Association’s vice president for economic forecasting. The Mortgage Bankers Association said its refinance index, which measures refinancing activity weekly, stood at 5,904.5 as of Jan. 2, up from 1,254 on Nov. 21, before the Fed’s announcement. During the same time period, its purchase index rose to 344.2, from 261.6. The survey does not measure how many of those applications become loans.“Refinance activity continues to be strong, but purchase inquiries are relatively static,” said Cameron Findlay, chief economist at LendingTree.Of course, buying a home is a more lengthy process than simply calling up a mortgage broker to refinance, and activity typically slows during the holiday season. But many home buyers are discouraged from jumping into the housing market given the increasingly dismal economic outlook. Meanwhile, to qualify for the best rates, consumers still face stiff requirements. Borrowers need a credit score of about 720, along with 10 to 20 percent of equity in their homes. And many homeowners need to sell their existing properties to consider a new one. Consumers can bide their time for now, because rates are expected to remain at attractive levels. “We are looking at mortgage rates to be about 5 percent or slightly higher through most of 2009,” Ms. Velz said.There were hopes that rates would fall even further. Last month, the Treasury Department was reportedly talking to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac about ways to push rates as low as 4.5 percent. But no action has been taken, and the Treasury is not expected to put forth a new proposal in the last days of the Bush administration.

Sunday, January 4, 2009

Mortgage brokers act an essential and critical role in the economic system

Mortgage brokers act an essential and critical role in the economic system. Now, mortgage broker bond has becomes the substantial bond and it's essential for the people who are fussy in the stage business of mortgage broker business, mortgage lending trade. Mortgage

Mortgage lenders or dealers are necessary to get license and authority from the licensing department. This mortgage license is necessary for the mortgage brokers who are busy in the business of mortgage in their state. To get this mortgage broker license, the candidate is required to get mortgage broker bond from the suitable state. Mortgage broker bonds are issued as per the act and order of the state and federal jurisdiction.

Mortgage broker bond ensures good performance of mortgage trade without any default rule of the mortgage broker or provider. Mortgage broker bonds are given all over the various parts of the states and so many industries analyzed the requirement of mortgage broker bond in their state.

Mortgage broker bond defends the oblige against the non public presentation of agreement by the principal in the state and put into effect the mortgage broker to give a performance. Today, tendency has been changed and most of the people are enforced to issue mortgage broker bonds as per the state rule. Mortgage broker bond also makes part of different kinds of security bonds and mortgage broker bond are given in separate forms and special bond amounts.

Mortgage broker bonds play an efficient role in the financial system and all most every part of the earth mortgage broker bonds are required.